Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ecstasy posters?
15-05-2010, 08:08 AM
Post: #1
Ecstasy posters?
That no society can exist without institutional structures is transparently clear to anyone who has not been stupefied by Stirner and his kind. By denying institutions and democracy, lifestyle anarchism insulates itself from social reality, so that it can fume all the more with futile rage, thereby remaining a subcultural caper for gullible youth and bored consumers of black garments and ecstasy posters. (bold added)To argue that democracy and anarchism are incompatible because any impediment to the wishes of even 'a minority of one' constitutes a violation of personal autonomy is to advocate not a free society but Brown's 'collection of individuals' -- in short, a herd. No longer would 'imagination' come to 'power.' Power, which always exists, will belong either to the collective in a face-to-face and clearly institutionalized democracy, or to the egos of a few oligarchs who will produce a 'tyranny of structurelessness.'

-Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism
, Murray Bookchin

The comment about clothing probably refers to Black Blocs, or protesters dressed in black and occasionally dressed in padding and riot gear in order to represent solidarity. What's the ecstasy poster thing about? The first thing that came to my mind is drugs.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
23-05-2010, 04:59 PM (This post was last modified: 23-05-2010 05:01 PM by Karlos Marxos.)
Post: #2
RE: Ecstasy posters?
(15-05-2010 08:08 AM)Crunkenstein Wrote:  That no society can exist without institutional structures is transparently clear to anyone who has not been stupefied by Stirner and his kind. By denying institutions and democracy, lifestyle anarchism insulates itself from social reality, so that it can fume all the more with futile rage, thereby remaining a subcultural caper for gullible youth and bored consumers of black garments and ecstasy posters. (bold added)To argue that democracy and anarchism are incompatible because any impediment to the wishes of even 'a minority of one' constitutes a violation of personal autonomy is to advocate not a free society but Brown's 'collection of individuals' -- in short, a herd. No longer would 'imagination' come to 'power.' Power, which always exists, will belong either to the collective in a face-to-face and clearly institutionalized democracy, or to the egos of a few oligarchs who will produce a 'tyranny of structurelessness.'

-Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism
, Murray Bookchin

The comment about clothing probably refers to Black Blocs, or protesters dressed in black and occasionally dressed in padding and riot gear in order to represent solidarity. What's the ecstasy poster thing about? The first thing that came to my mind is drugs.

I do not know what it is all about, my good sir. But it's very interesting, and makes very good points about the inane convolutedness of the various Individualist-Anarchisms.

"Heroism is either a great evil, or it is a great folly.
"When it is foisted upon the individual by a defeated society which has given up on itself, it is evil.
"So defeated is it that it has raised a lone person, exponentially weaker than the public he is meant to defend, to combat a great peril which threatens it, which includes, as a matter of course, the very life of the hero.
"And when it takes the life of the hero, he has not been sacrificed on the altar of society, but rather sentenced to the executioner's block.
"When it is foolishly taken up by the naïve individual in the face of a defeated society, which has yet to attempt to defend itself when it clearly can, and he clearly thinks contrariwise, it is folly."
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump: